The Problem with Growth
It’s important to define our problem clearly, and attack its core, to expose its weaknesses.
Trump’s Administration is literally using the 3rd world empire playbook, that historically has been used against everyone else, by claiming shared values with their 1% oligarchs, while using the dollar’s exorbitant privilege, to steal cheap minerals, oil, gas, labor and land.
We’ve done this many times to countries like Iran, Mexico, East Asian nations, since the end of WWI & II, now our oligarchs, in bed with Trump, are doing it to our own citizens; history shows this trend started with Nixon, continued with Clinton, Obama and now the Orange 🍊 Trusk$ is using the same playbook.
Nothing here is new, the difference is that it’s done in the open and the villainy is actually praised in the open too, instead of under the cover of wicked neo-liberal economic narrative.
Chomsky et. al. has been pointing this out since the 60s, and now Chris Hedges is taking up the line of argument and helping to speak truth to power.
The “Growth” game is over
We need a new narrative, new value based system overhaul, and we must tare down the mutated corrupt financial cancer inside our republic, for a new democratic narrative, with degrowth as core to the economic story, instead of capitalism, which wrecks infinite destruction on the planet; the trajectory of the “Abundance” narrative and its infinite growth & innovation is pure self destruction and madness.
The joining of power between government and capitalism is truly morally corrupt, and unjust broken formula.
It’s important to realize that Democracy and Capitalism do not mix, in fact they’re opposite forces with opposing values. A simple table showing these opposing and different values:
Political > Economic Powers = Values
Oligarchy > Capitalism = Winner Takes All value
Democracy > Socialism = Conservation of Resources for All values
A new narrative of degrowth and unalienable rights to economic development for all must rise, and take over the unleashing of corporations monopolistic capitalism, that steals the Wealth of Nations.
Big socialist government and systems of values is democracy and economic justice for all.
Ai Critique
The blog post "The Problem with Growth" argues that U.S. economic policies under Trump and previous administrations mirror historical imperialist tactics used against weaker nations, now turned inward against American citizens. It posits that capitalism and democracy are fundamentally incompatible, advocating for a socialist "degrowth" model prioritizing environmental sustainability and economic justice over infinite expansion.
Summary of Key Arguments:
1. Domestic Imperialism Critique
The author claims Trump’s administration employs a "third-world empire playbook" – leveraging dollar dominance, military power, and oligarchic alliances to extract resources/wealth from citizens, continuing a trend started by Nixon and expanded by Clinton/Obama.
2. Capitalism-Democracy Incompatibility
A central thesis asserts capitalism’s "Winner Takes All" values conflict with democracy’s "Conservation for All" principles. The blog presents this as a binary opposition through a table contrasting oligarchic capitalism with democratic socialism.
3. Call for Degrowth Socialism
Rejecting infinite growth narratives, the piece demands replacing capitalism with a socialist system emphasizing:
Resource conservation
Universal economic rights
Eradication of corporate monopolies
Government prioritizing democratic values over profit
Critique
Strengths
Provocative Historical Parallels: Linking domestic policies to imperialist strategies offers a fresh lens to analyze wealth inequality and corporate overreach.
Clear Ideological Stance: The capitalism vs. democracy dichotomy provides a rallying point for anti-capitalist movements.
Timely Degrowth Advocacy: Aligns with rising concerns about climate change and AI-driven job displacement, making "infinite growth" critiques increasingly mainstream.
Weaknesses
Oversimplified Binary Framing: The capitalism=bad/democracy=good table ignores mixed economies (e.g., Nordic models) that blend capitalist markets with robust social safety nets. No engagement with democratic capitalist theorists like Amartya Sen.
Underdeveloped Solutions: While criticizing growth, the blog offers few concrete policies beyond referencing Univrs.io (an unclear platform). No discussion of transitioning from current systems or addressing potential downsides of degrowth (e.g., energy rationing).
Historical Accuracy Gaps: Claims about continuity from Nixon to Obama lack specific policy examples. Overlooks key differences between administrations (e.g., Obama’s ACA vs. Trump’s tax cuts).
Tone Limitations: Phrases like "Orange 🍊 Trusk$" and "mutated corrupt financial cancer" risk alienating moderates. Relies heavily on activist intellectuals (Chomsky/Hedges) without engaging counterarguments from economists.
This polemic succeeds in synthesizing left-wing critiques of capitalism but falters in bridging theory to actionable policy. Its greatest contribution lies in reframing domestic economic issues through the lens of imperialist tactics – a metaphor that could resonate amid growing wealth disparities. However, the lack of nuance regarding historical precedents and alternative viewpoints weakens its persuasiveness for audiences outside already anti-capitalist circles.
Last updated